Politics, aggression, and listening
23 July, 2015
Politics, aggression, and listening
A record number of people in Georgia dislike all political forces. The strange thing is that if you look at Georgia’s media, that is not at all the picture you will see. Georgia’s media portrays two groups; those who affiliate with this ruling team and those who affiliate with the previous ruling team. The broadcast waves are dominated by those who are fairly easy to portray as one or the other and everybody else is considered somewhere in the middle, a “shuashist” (shua - middle in Georgian).

Somebody who doesn’t like one part of what is happening is labeled a dissident by the government and everything they say is seen as simply unthinking loyalty to the opposition. Meanwhile, those broadly sympathetic to the opposition refuse to recognize any shortcomings in their team, their team’s past record or any positive steps the current government has taken.

Why? The world is complex, and no sub-world is more complex than Georgian politics. When faced with complexity, some people have a tendency to break things down into two sides. We are used to having two sides. So many games have two sides that oppose each other. If there are two groups and they are different, there are always some members of each that will begin to try to move the team to be in opposition to the other side. This push to opposition is connected to control. Control of the ball, or territory, of wealth or power. The more one side pushes against the other the more the other side seems to respond.
That was the case in the Soviet period. There was one party and one state and anybody who didn’t like it was a dissident and the system didn’t allow for that. Most post-Soviet states that have tried to become democracies have had difficulty handling a diversity of opinion. Somebody who doesn’t like one part of what is happening is labeled a dissident by the government and everything they say is seen as simply unthinking loyalty to the opposition. Meanwhile, those broadly sympathetic to the opposition refuse to recognize any shortcomings in their team, their team’s past record or any positive steps the current government has taken. This, of course, confirms the ruling team’s preconceptions.
And if one team or another has difficulty portraying a vision that people understand, difficulty finding solutions to problems or explaining them, if they are simply confused, feel weak and
under threat, they have a natural tendency to simply blame. It’s an escape, it is easy and there will always be others who support this blame. But as it turns out, these “others” will simply walk away. When a group of people is pointing the finger at each other and the cameras point at them, those not pointing fingers, tend to move to the outside or just leave. Soon the loudest blamers and most aggressive pointers seem to take up all the space, leaving less room for those who speak more quietly, who don’t blame, who propose solutions, or who are simply more practical in what they say.
It is the nature of TV and radio. The cheapest TV show to produce has a host and two or three people who hate each other yelling at each other. It has many benefits for the producer. 1) It is incredibly cheap to produce since, it costs almost nothing; 2) it gives the appearance of democracy because “both views” are shown. Never mind that there are always more than two views and usually the better and more informed views are not the ones that diametrically oppose each other; 3) it requires no research. When addressing some particular political dispute of the day, if there are government and opposition involved representatives, they will yell at each other, but they don’t necessarily know much about the bigger context of the issue; 4) it keeps the same old people on TV, and they enjoy being on TV, and nobody has to research new people with new ideas.
In a different environment, journalists would concentrate on issues and try to understand several different ways of looking at the issue at hand, what different possible solutions are and what their consequences would be. But that would take work, often a great deal of work, and perhaps more education than some journalists or producers have.
So what can be done about this? The first thing would be for journalists to find more unaffiliated experts. All these experts on TV tend to be the same people who have been on TV for years, most are politically affiliated and many don’t have very many new ideas. Often journalists simply have a few they know and regardless of the topic, will call down the list the one they know who seems closest to the sector. Don’t do this. And the same goes for citizens. For people who are interested in a particular topic, find people who know about it and ask them for new people to talk to, and focus on those who aren’t so partisan.
Do research on topics. If you have time, look around at what is written about it, and what is done in other countries. Who are the professors who know about it? Focus on solutions rather than problems. That doesn’t mean the problems don’t need to be understood, but look at problems with an eye towards solving them rather than figuring out whose fault they are. Listen to the polite people and the ones for whom it is not clear how they will vote.
Generally you can learn more from reading than listening and more from listening than watching. Focus on local problems, things that affect you directly rather than big abstract things. Those are the things that matter.

Other Stories
Eco-Friendly Habits: How to Clean Your Off-Roading Vehicle Responsibly
Irresponsible waste disposal practices continue to have drastic effects on the environment.
 5 Techniques for Finding Your Inner Creativity
Whether you’re a writer, artist, or even a marketing executive, you’ve probably had days where you felt completely uninspired.
A suitcase full of wine and a heart full of memories
I left Switzerland and arrived in Tbilisi on December 28.
Five Reasons to Visit Georgia in 2017
If you've been searching for a unique place to vacation in 2017, the beautiful country of Georgia holds some hidden treasures.
“All roads lead to Rome” – states one of the most famous medieval proverbs. It’s fascinating to think how much the narrow streets and glorious walls of this eternal city have seen.
It’s Not So Bad, Chaps- Just Look at the Yanks: Ogden on Comparable Politics
Electoral fever is dying down in Georgia as it ramps up in the United States.
 “Moral Inversion” - Pre-election period in Georgia
Georgian pre-election period can be classified as “Moral Inversion”, a notion first put forward by Michael Polanyi.
America’s Trump Card
America’s Trump Card
Like it or not, the name of the 45th American President will most likely be Donald Trump.
Clock is not counting down, it is adding up!
On Saturday for the ceremony in Charleston, instead of wedding gifts, the Managing Editor of Georgian Journal, Will Cathcart
A Protectionist Perspective: Ensuring A Georgian Future
Unlike many of my compatriots, I view my country as a sentient creature, a single organism. The mountains
Back in BSSR
Back in BSSR
"I remember that when I was a schoolgirl, they told us we have to be ready to give our lives for the motherland.
Thank you, father, for saving me from USSR!
On the 11th of October, the population of Belarus has elected Alexander Lukashenko to serve his fifth term
The EU Getting Squeezed in Georgia
Recent polls have shown that the EU is less and less popular in Georgia. The reason is that they
What is Georgia’s Military For?
There are two possible uses for Georgia’s military. The first would be to fight a war with an external threat or by its existence, to deter
Last weekend I went to a hackathon in San Francisco called Protohack. In the former Soviet Union, people tend to think of hacking
European Migrant Crisis: The good, the bad and the liar
“I call an animal, a species, an individual corrupt, when it loses its instincts, when it prefers what is injurious
Refugees in Georgia
Refugees in Georgia
The people of Syria see the Assad regime weakening, and considering who may take over and what they might
David and Goliath: A Realpolitik Rendition
A Conservative Contrarian View on Georgia’s Geopolitical Dilemma
The Bleeding of Rustavi 2 - Our New August Surprise
When the powerful have to make something happen that they want few people to notice, they issue the statement late in the afternoon
The Good Neighbor
The Good Neighbor
In 2012, Georgia was promised to witness what ex-Prime Minister Ivanishvili called “a new age.” It would be achieved by “restarting”
Independence, Institutions and Corruption
People talk about Georgia choosing between Russia and the West as if Georgia ended up at a soccer game and, well, since we’re here we may
Confederate flags in Georgia
I have seen a few confederate flags in Tbilisi. Some on used cars that have come from the United States, stickers here and there, even a few
Thirty pieces of Russian silver
“But why are we speaking so long about one enemy who now avows that he is one, whom I now do not fear because a wall is between
Georgia and Iran - The key now is speed
After the 1979 Iranian revolution, the international community has not really known how to deal with Iran. And the fact of the revolution illustrates
Seven Deadly Sins of Georgian Business
For many years, all we’ve been hearing from our government(s) is how important small and medium enterprises are for the economy
Other Stories
GEL Exchange