O’Hanlon Dishes out Bitter Pills for Georgia: The US Cannot Protect the Whole World
25 April, 2017
O’Hanlon Dishes out Bitter Pills for Georgia: The US Cannot Protect the Whole World
When Wall Street Journal writes something about Georgia, Georgian people (those who know what WSJ is) read it. When Wall Street Journal publishes an article about Georgia’s (and Ukraine’s) permanent neutrality status as a medicament for its security ailments, people read with great interest.

Panorama Talk Show and GEORGIA TODAY contacted Michael O’Hanlon, a US scholar at the Brookings Institute who did just that: in his article, he opines that NATO membership is unrealistic for Georgia and Ukraine and that these
countries would be better off declaring neutrality and having “security assurances” from the US and Russia.

Armed with righteous fury and two pinches of skepticism, we start off by asking him in what reality Georgia’s neutrality would be sustainable, seeing as to maintain it, the country should be able to defend it (militarily) and afford it (economically).

He suggests we compare his scenario with what we have now. And what we have is not much, he thinks, as the West’s promise to grant Georgia the NATO Membership Action Plan, made in Bucharest in 2008, remains unfulfilled, with no timeline provided to do so.

“And as we know, that very summer was when Russian forces invaded Georgia. And we’ve seen subsequently that Russia seized Crimea and then contributed to separatist fighting in Eastern Ukraine in 2014. Ukraine was also promised eventual NATO membership, with no specificity and no Membership Action Plan. Therefore, I think the current strategy is not working. The current strategy is leaving Georgia, Ukraine and other countries of Eastern Europe vulnerable,” O’Hanlon says.

He is not alone in his conclusion, of course. There are many who would agree. And many who would claim that those who don’t are just unable to swallow a certain bitter pill known as hard truth. But what is O’Hanlon’s alternative and how viable is it?

“I’ve concluded that we would be better off trying to negotiate with Russia an understanding that countries like Georgia and Ukraine will have every opportunity to join any other association they wish, economically or politically, but NATO expansion will no longer continue and will not include them. I hope that would be a way to actually persuade Russia...”

Basically, we say, you are calling for the West to create so-called buffer zones. The very thing we (and Ukrainians) don’t want to be. What follows is a wording battle.

“Well, I don’t propose they be called a ‘buffer zone’ for Russia. These are your words, not mine. I propose neutrality. Buffer zone implies that Georgia and Ukraine have less sovereign right to their own decisions and that they are somehow pawns in a greater strategic game between great countries. I don’t want to use this kind of language. I fully respect the sovereignty and independence and all the rights that Georgia and Ukraine have. I insist that any future security architecture would preserve those rights. The issue is: should they be in NATO or should they be neutral? I think that neutrality would serve them better and serve the United States better, as well.”

Unconvinced, we ask how that might be. In his article, which will soon be followed by an entire book on the matter, he says that it will have the form of an agreement which Russia has to follow and adhere to. The same Russia that is notorious for violating agreements. On this, at least, we seem to be on the same page. He admits that it “is a very serious concern” and says he has leverages in mind that would dissuade (hopefully) Russia from disrespecting the deal.

“We will only lift sanctions on Russia if they agree to remove military forces and resolve the so-called frozen conflicts in Ukraine and Georgia. And if Russia wants to make sure the two don't join the Alliance in the future, it has to respect the deal and allow verification of that deal.”

So, economic sanctions and the threat of future NATO expansion. Hard as that might be to imagine, if Russia still goes and violates it, what happens next? Perhaps the United States would be ready to step in and fight for Georgia?

He says that this is the exact thing that he does not want the US to do.

“I’m proposing that we NOT expand our military alliance. There is a small number of American forces training with the Georgians. That’s fine. And obviously, many Americans are extremely grateful to Georgia for its contributions in international security operations like in Afghanistan. But,” he says, “you’ll have to work it out with Russia. The US cannot protect the whole world – especially a small country right next to Russia. We don’t have the capability to do that.”

So, the scenario goes like this: this tiny country is left alone to negotiate an incredibly complex deal with a mammoth of a neighbor, and if said neighbor reconsiders the terms of the deal, the tiny country stays there alone and undefended. So much for security guarantees, we say. He says there isn’t one. At least for us. A bucketload of bitter pills, this one.

“At one level, there is no guarantee, and that’s the simple fact of the matter,” he tells us. “Georgia is in a place where it is too small and too far away for any completely dependable guarantee to be issued by anybody. To date, as you know, Georgia has not received any meaningful security guarantees from anyone. I don’t know how to change that. The word “guarantee” in English is a very strong word, as you know.”

To his defense, he says Russia and Georgia have to agree on an agreement or it won’t work. His proposal also includes removing Russian military forces from Georgian territories, a prospect that would be very popular with Georgian people, perhaps even if it came at the price of all and every Euro-Atlantic aspiration. Would Moscow remove its bases from Abkhazia and South Ossetia too, though? He says it also has to be agreed chiefly between Georgia and Russia, and the same goes for Ukraine, but the West would also “participate in the wider framework of these negotiations and be solemnly on the side of the smaller countries as they have these negotiations with Russia.”

We ask what his motivation was for talking about neutral Georgia and neutral Ukraine in his WSJ article.

He handles the question well. And dishes out another portion of those pills as a farewell monologue.

“Well, I’m not on the Russian payroll. I would suggest that my Georgian friends take stock of where they are today. Right now, they have a very ambiguous promise of future NATO membership, which will probably never happen as long as they still have disputes with Russia over the territories of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. So, if I were a Georgian, I would simply encourage you to think clearly about your current options. I do not think you have a good option now with NATO membership, nor do I think you’re going to get one. Moreover, as an American, I have the right to ask whether I want to see my children, my neighbors, my friends, in a military commitment to defend people halfway around the world. It is not smart; it’s not realistic. And I don’t feel that I should be pledging my fellow Americans and their potential lives to defend a country that is not currently in NATO and probably cannot be defended in any plausible way because it’s so far away.”

Spoken like a chess grand master, and there he was saying he wouldn’t compare Georgia and Ukraine to pawns. But all this Realpolitik aside – If this is how things are, many would think us fools. Heartbroken fools, at that.

“We’ve been toiling for a fair chance of joining the Euro-Atlantic alliance for years now,” we tell him. “And don’t forget Afghanistan, where we pledged the lives of our friends and fellow Georgians to defend the common values Georgia and the US seem to believe in”. And it’s all in vain, if we follow O’Hanlon’s logic. We don’t, but we are disappointed nonetheless, as will be the many who read it. We ask him about that as our final question.

“Yes, I think it could be disappointing for a while; I expect that some of my readers in Georgia would be angry. I understand that. There should be a debate; I’m glad to hear there’s a debate. I think it will take a while for this kind of idea to be fully digested,” he says.

Vazha Tavberidze
Source: Georgia Today
Print
Other Stories
Council of Europe member states condemn Syria’s recognition of Georgia's occupied regions
Recognition of the so-called independence of Abkhazia and the Tskhinvali Region/South Ossetia by the Syrian regime
Syria recognizes Georgia’s occupied regions as independent states
De-facto foreign ministry of occupied Tskhinvali Region of Georgia and so-called president’s administration of occupied Abkhazia
Jens Stoltenberg and members of alliance support Georgia’s integration with NATO
Members of the alliance support Georgia’s integration with NATO in the final declaration of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly.
NATO Parliamentary Assembly accuses Russia of human rights violations in Ukraine and Georgia
Iryna Friz, the chairman of Ukraine’s permanent delegation, stated on her social media account
Georgia's President initiates to simplify procedures on obtaining dual citizenship
President Giorgi Margvelashvili asks the Parliament to set more liberal and simplified procedures
President of Lithuania congratulates Georgia on Independence Day in Georgian language
President of Lithuania Dalia Grybauskaite has congratulated Georgian population on the 100th anniversary
Members of European Parliament Congratulate Georgia
To celebrate Georgia’s Independence Day, we pass on to the Georgian people the messages of congratulations
Jean-Claude Juncker to visit Tbilisi in relation to Independence Day of Georgia
Upon the invitation of President Giorgi Margvelashvili, Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission, will visit Georgia today.
European Court of Human Rights held final hearing in case of Russian-Georgian war 2008
The European Court of Human Rights held a final hearing in the case of Georgia v. Russia (II) on May 23.
National Geographic uncovers tragic story of people living in conflict zones between Georgia and Russia-occupied territory
National Geographic uncovers the Russian intervention of Georgia in August 2008, also known as Russo-Georgian War.
Interior Minister explained reasons behind police raid at Tbilisi night clubs in Parliament
Minister of Internal Affairs of Georgia Giorgi Gakharia addressed MPs at the plenary session of the Parliament held on May 18.
Georgian government working on amendments against illegal migration
As reported by the Georgian Prime Minister Giorgi Kvirikashvil, the Justice Ministry has prepared amendments against illegal migration in Georgia.
US concerned over de facto South Ossetian authorities’ decision to close so-called administrative boundary line
The US Department of State is concerned by the decision of de facto South Ossetian authorities
Georgia's President congratulates the World War II veterans on Victory Day
Our ancestors all over the world could defeat fascism, as a violent and anti-human regime that threatened humanity,
De facto Ministry of Abkhazia criticizes Council of Europe’s support towards new peace initiative of Georgia
The de facto Abkhazian Foreign Ministry of Georgia’s breakaway region of Abkhazia has responded to the resolution
Chairman of NATO Military Committee: “If Russia had not invaded Transnistria, Georgia and Ukraine, NATO would not have strengthened its military”
If Russia had not invaded Transnistria, Georgia and Ukraine, NATO would not have strengthened its military presence
Council of Europe welcomes new peace initiative of Georgia to promote interaction with Abkhazia and Tskhinvali
The Committee of Ministers' Deputies of the Council of Europe at its 1315th session adopted yet another decision
US Assistant Secretary visits occupation line: "We call on the Russia to withdraw the recognition of these regions"
The US Assistant Secretary at the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs Aaron Wess Mitchell visited the village Odzisi,
Ireland recognizes Georgia as safe country
The Republic of Ireland has put Georgia on a list of safe countries.
Jens Stoltenberg says Georgia greatly supports NATO by participating in its missions and operations
“Georgia is a very close partner of NATO. We are carrying out different kinds of activities
Former Prime Minister and billionaire Bidzina Ivanishvili is returning to politics
Former Prime Minister Bidzina Ivanishvili has agreed to lead the Georgian Dream
“One day Georgia will become a member of NATO “, - President of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly
Georgia hosts NATO Parliamentary Assembly Seminar in Batumi, Adjara region.
NATO Days officially open in Georgia
President of Georgia Giorgi Margvelashvili has opened NATO Days.
The Bucharest Summit Revisited
John 20:29: “How blessed are those who have not seen and yet believed”.
US mission to OSCE welcomes Georgia’s peace initiative regarding it occupied territories
The United States mission to the OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe) responded to the discussion
PHOTO OF THE DAY
Exchange Rates
GEL Exchange Rate
Convertor
22.06.2018
23.06.2018
USD
1
USD
2.4579
2.4578
EUR
1
EUR
2.8357
2.8597
GBP
1
GBP
3.2267
3.2659
RUB
100
RUB
3.8519
3.8955
Other Stories
On 26 May, Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission, joined celebrations in the Georgian capital of Tbilisi
Violation of Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity by Assad regime has been strictly criticized
Exactly one year ago, Georgia was granted visa-free travel with the European Union.
Georgia’s ex-president president Mikheil Saakashvili's supporters managed to free detained Mikheil Saakashvili in the center of Kiev.
The US Ambassador to Georgia Ian Kelly congratulates Georgia on Independence Day.
The regulations on the introduction of visa-free travel for citizens of Georgia have been officially signed in Brussels.
The entire Georgia is involved in Secret Santa game, which means that people are sending gifts to each other secretly
The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Georgia is taking part in NATO Ministerial underway in Brussels, Belgium.
A special squad has been mobilized at the 48th polling station in Marneuli, Kvemo Kartli region.
Two politicians in Georgia have come to blows during a live TV debate ahead of the country’s parliamentary elections, Euronews reports.
GEL Exchange
USD
1
USD
2.4578
EUR
1
EUR
2.8597
GBP
1
GBP
3.2659
RUB
100
RUB
3.8955